From the monthly archives:

January 2009

Why Legal Authority Works: Myth versus Reality

by A. Harrison Barnes on January 29, 2009

The most common means of obtaining a job was a letter or other “self-initiated contact” with the employer …”

-National Association of Law Placement

If you contact all of the employers in a given city that match your interests—if there is a job for you, you will find it. It is as simple as that. No job boards, classified sections, legal recruiters, on campus interviewing program or job fair has all of the jobs and many employers DO NOT HAVE JOBS until they are presented with a candidate that is attractive to them. It is as simple as that.

LEGAL MYTH: This is just mass mailing, which is one of the most ineffective ways to find a job.

LEGAL AUTHORITY: You’re right, mass mailing is an ineffective way to find a job. However, targeted mailing is NOT mass mailing! Mass mailings are generic letters that make a blanket statement to firms of all sizes, locations, and disciplines. You can expect one or two letters out of every hundred to solicit any response. On the other hand, targeted mailings are letters to a carefully compiled list of employers, distinctive as a group for their geographical location, type and size of firm, and areas of practice. With targeted mailings, you can expect a much greater return.

The National Association for Legal Placement, a non-profit legal research organization, has determined that targeted, self-initiated mailing was the most successful job hunt tactic used by graduates and experienced attorneys, beating both on-campus interview programs and online resume posting.

LEGAL MYTH: I’ll just post my resume on Monster.com, and wait for the fruit baskets to come rolling in.

LEGAL AUTHORITY: Monster.com is effective for companies that are comfortable with online job hunting and recruiting. As a rule, law firms remain most comfortable with “snail mail” – cover letters and resumes they receive from the post office, not from the Internet. Writing professional cover letters, on good stationery that show you have taken the time to contact the firm by writing a letter, addressing an envelope, stamping it and putting it in the mailbox is far more effective than simply hitting the “send” button on your email program.

With the number of attorneys seeking jobs, hiring partners and recruiting coordinators have the luxury of waiting for the resumes to come in the door. Unless they are doing proactive recruiting with legal search firms or law schools, there is little “resume searching” that is done.

LEGAL MYTH: I can’t trust my future career prospects to your firm – I need to do it all myself.

LEGAL AUTHORITY: With Legal Authority you are doing it all yourself! Who better to trust your future with than a firm that spends 100% of its time creating and revising resumes and cover letters for attorneys? We will help you save time, improve your resume, and create a cover letter that will garner attention. With your input, we will select the firms that meet your standards, and you will have approval every step of the way. You—and not us—will be sending out the final cover letters and resumes. Why spend valuable time researching firms when we have one of the most sophisticated databases in the industry that will guarantee accuracy and precision?

LEGAL MYTH: I already have a headhunter – I don’t need to do any more work to find a job.

LEGAL AUTHORITY: The truth is, many legal recruiters have a distinct disadvantage over self-initiated targeted mailing. For in-house hiring, clerkships, and of counsel positions, you have a much greater chance of receiving a positive response if you do not use a recruiter. For many law firm positions, recruiters will limit your exposure to a small amount of firms, normally less than 20 firms! Targeted mailing can be done for more firms, and we can help you send resumes and cover letters to as many hundreds of firms as you desire!

LEGAL MYTH: I don’t have the time to prepare 200 cover letters and resumes.

LEGAL AUTHORITY: All it takes is filling out our Firm Profiler, spending a short amount on the phone with us discussing your options, and signing your cover letters. That’s all the time you’ll spend in your job search. Legal Authority is committed to helping you, the busy attorney, in your job search. Click here to see how the process works.

Share This Story:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • BlinkList
  • Blogosphere News
  • Blogsvine
  • description
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Faves
  • Furl
  • Live
  • NewsVine
  • Print this article!
  • Propeller
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • YahooMyWeb

{ 0 comments }

Myth Versus Reality: Federal Clerkships, State & County Clerkships

by A. Harrison Barnes on January 27, 2009

Talk about prestige, a clerkship is one of the highest honors in the legal profession and there are numerous places you can clerk. What a fantastic opportunity this can provide to advance your career and be part of the inner workings of the court system. And you can do this at any point in your career. In fact, clerkships are not just for recent graduates, they are also for people who have been practicing for quite a while and are seeking the opportunity to give something back to the legal system.

LEGALMYTH:
Only people who were on law review at Harvard Law School can get a clerkship.

LEGALAUTHORITY:

There are thousands and thousands of clerkships and they are open to all! Certainly, the more prestigious clerkships can be more difficult to get. Nevertheless, you too can be a clerk!

Share This Story:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • BlinkList
  • Blogosphere News
  • Blogsvine
  • description
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Faves
  • Furl
  • Live
  • NewsVine
  • Print this article!
  • Propeller
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • YahooMyWeb

{ 0 comments }

Myth versus Reality: Law School Professor Jobs

by A. Harrison Barnes on January 26, 2009

Yes… you can be a law professor if you are already a lawyer. Want to see if there are any law schools out there that are interested in you? We can help you contact all the law schools in a given area of the United States and find out—very quickly—if they have any interest in you. Researching all the contact information for various law schools could take you weeks. In less than a week, we can have your resume on the desks of the Deans of the law schools you want to approach.

The job as a law school professor may not pay as much as working for a corporation or a law firm; however, this type of job can certainly be more rewarding. Here, you will have the opportunity to impart your wisdom to young charges seeking emotionally or financially rewarding careers in the law.

LEGAL MYTH:
It is impossible to find a position as a law professor.

LEGALAUTHORITY:
If you think it is hard finding an advertised position in a law firm or corporation, you are going to have to wait a long, long time before you find an advertised position to be a law professor. There are thousands of positions in law schools and many of these are filled each year because the law school simply receives an inquiry from an interested applicant. Keep in mind the teaching hours at law school are far better. The old adage of “you never know until you try” could not be more apropos for your search for a position as a law professor.

Confidentiality is a serious concern for any job seeker. That’s why we will provide you with the actual letters, for your signature, for you send out your materials to. Accordingly, you will never be contacting a law school you do not want to contact—or worse—your own law school. This is the way it should be. We will provide you with the contacts and you can run your job search with the letters, resumes, and so forth we prepare on your behalf.

Share This Story:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • BlinkList
  • Blogosphere News
  • Blogsvine
  • description
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Faves
  • Furl
  • Live
  • NewsVine
  • Print this article!
  • Propeller
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • YahooMyWeb

{ 0 comments }

Myth Versus Reality for In-House Jobs

by A. Harrison Barnes on January 23, 2009

Looking for the perfect in house position? Our database contains every in house legal department in the United States. Get the in-house position you want now! We can cover a city, or the entire nation. Our job at Legalauthority is to ensure that we put your name in front of every company that may need an attorney like you. As everyone knows, getting an in-house position can be one of the hardest things for any attorney to do. Until now, most job seeker relied principally on job search boards, the occasional recruiter job and the hope that they have a contact—somewhere—that has the perfect in house position.

In house positions can mean the lack of a billable hour, stock options and even the possibility of a management position within an important corporation. Many in-house attorneys earn far more per year than their counterparts in major American law firms. If you are interested in an in-house position, we can be the force that helps you get there.

LEGAL MYTH:
There are no in-house positions out there.

LEGALAUTHORITY:
There are thousands and thousands of in house legal departments throughout the United States. These companies are hiring attorneys on an ongoing basis. The fact of the matter is, however, these positions are very difficult to locate and finding them often requires that you simply randomly contact a given company and apprise them of your interest. This is where we come in.

LEGAL MYTH:
A recruiter is the best way to find an in house position.

LEGALAUTHORITY:
Probably less than 5% of all in-house positions are filled through recruiters. In addition, in some cities there may be over 200 recruiting firms. If you are looking for an in-house position in the traditional way you are going to lose your mind tracking down all the recruiters out there. Additionally, many recruiters demand “exclusivity” from their in-house clients meaning that the in-house client is prohibited from advertising the given position. This means that the recruiter is only going to show their in-house client the candidates it wants to have an opportunity to work in the firm. This may be great; however, it is going to make it a lot more difficult for you to get the position you are seeking.

LEGALMYTH:
In house jobs are best gotten through friends.

LEGALAUTHORITY:
In some cases this is true; however, it is true because in-house legal departments rarely have any idea of how to do recruiting. Many in-house legal departments have scarcely an idea of how to promote their legal positions. Remember, you are dealing with corporations—not law firms—and contacting these companies directly is often the only way to get in there.

Confidentiality is a serious concern for any job seeker. That’s why we will provide you with the actual letters, for your signature, for you send out your materials to. Accordingly, you will never be contacting a company you do not want to contact—or worse—one of your own clients. This is the way it should be. We will provide you with the contacts and you can run your job search with the letters, resumes and so forth we prepare on your behalf.

Share This Story:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • BlinkList
  • Blogosphere News
  • Blogsvine
  • description
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Faves
  • Furl
  • Live
  • NewsVine
  • Print this article!
  • Propeller
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • YahooMyWeb

{ 0 comments }

Myth Versus Reality for Law Firm Jobs

by A. Harrison Barnes on January 22, 2009

Looking for the perfect law firm position? Our database contains virtually every law firm in the United States, Europe and Asia. Simply pick the city you are interested in, your practice group and allow our research team to do the work of preparing your letters and helping you apply to firms. Modified on a daily basis, our database contains thousands of firms that are not even listed in Martindale Hubble or other traditional sources. If you want to practice law in a law firm, we can help you get the job you want. Sure you could spend weeks if not even months compiling information on all the law firms in the cities you are interested in. Alternatively, you could use Legalauthority.com to find the job you are seeking now!

LEGAL MYTH:
I will never find a law firm position.

LEGALAUTHORITY:
Right now, in virtually every American city, there is a law firm that needs an attorney just like you-regardless of your qualifications. This position could be tens of thousands of dollars more than you are making now. This position may not even be advertised and you are not going to find this law firm either by using Monster, 15 gizillion web sites, a headhunter, or even Martindale Hubble. Chances are … this firm is already in our database. Let us put you in touch with them today!

LEGAL MYTH:
It is better to work with a recruiter to find a law firm position.

LEGALAUTHORITY:
Unless you have stellar qualifications, there are very few recruiting firms that will work with you. While recruiters are enormously helpful in getting candidates a position, the fact of the matter is that unless you have stellar qualifications they will not be able to do you much good. Stellar qualifications mean that you are coming from a top law firm and attended a top law school. Recruiters are beneficial in making good matches; however, using a recruiter may not always be in your best interest.

In addition, smaller firms often do not use recruiters. This can result in you missing out on joining the next Skadden Arps or other great firm that does not use recruiters. Moreover, in a tough economy law firms like anyone need to cut back on their expenses. Using our service can help you get the position you are seeking without a recruiter’s involvement.

LEGAL MYTH:
If I spend enough time on job posting boards I will find the perfect law firm position.

LEGALAUTHORITY:
All firms do not advertise their open positions on job posting boards or in the classified section of your local newspaper. Sorry-if that is the only way you are doing your job search you are going to miss out on numerous opportunities.

LEGAL MYTH:
Only firms with advertised positions will ever interview me.

LEGALAUTHORITY:
Wrong. Most law firms are seeking attorneys to join their team at virtually all points in time. If you rely on only advertised positions, you are going to be missing out on a massive amount of potential positions on a constant and ongoing basis. If your resume and materials arrive at the firm at the right time, you may get an outstanding position.

Confidentiality is a serious concern for any job seeker. That’s why we will provide you with the actual letters, for your signature, for you send out your materials to. Accordingly, you will never be contacting a firm you do not want to contact-or worse-your own firm. This is the way it should be. We will provide you with the contacts and you can run your job search with the letters, resumes and so forth we prepare on your behalf. It has never been easier to get a legal job!

Share This Story:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • BlinkList
  • Blogosphere News
  • Blogsvine
  • description
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Faves
  • Furl
  • Live
  • NewsVine
  • Print this article!
  • Propeller
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • YahooMyWeb

{ 0 comments }

Which is Better A Federal or State Clerkship?

by A. Harrison Barnes on January 21, 2009

It depends. As discussed below, a state court clerkship will generally enhance your marketability if you are planning on working in the state where you are clerking. Nevertheless, the value of a clerkship should not necessarily be something that you view as a tool to make you marketable. Most importantly, the skills and insight you will acquire during your clerkship will be something that should help you throughout your career.

A. A State Court Clerkship Will be Most Likely to Make You Marketable if You Are Considering Working in the State Where You Will be Clerking.

It is useful to examine some of the differences between different types of clerkships. Each type of clerkship has its advantages and disadvantages. In order to help you understand the role a clerkship will have in your marketability, I believe it is useful to examine the differences between federal and state clerkships.

1. Federal Clerkships

At the Federal level, the order of prestige of clerkships is typically: (1) the Supreme Court, (2) Circuit (Appellate) clerkships, (3) Federal District Court (trial court) clerkships, (4) clerkships with United States magistrates (who do a lot of the “grunt work” for Federal District Judges). There are also several specialized courts (such as Federal Tax Court) which are of approximately the same prestige level as Federal District Court clerkships.

Appellate clerkships involve mainly research and writing about issues the trial court has already ruled on. This involves reviewing the lower court’s rulings for errors the District Court may have made when it ruled. Appellate clerkships typically involve more arcane and novel issues of law than are typically litigated at the trial level. In an appellate clerkship you are less likely to get to know the lawyers involved.

District Court clerkships involve actual issues being litigated at the trial court level and typically have more in-court action. In a district court clerkship you may see many of the same lawyers in court day in and day out. In a Circuit Court clerkship, you are likely to see the attorneys involved only when they present their appellate arguments in court.

There are also numerous distinctions between clerkships at the Federal level. For example, clerking for the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court is generally considered the most prestigious clerkship there is. Similarly, a clerkship with a federal district judge in the Eastern District of New York is more prestigious than a clerkship with a federal district judge in Bay City, Michigan, for example. Attorneys who clerk for the most prestigious judges are typically those whose “marketability” is likely to be increased as a result.

Typically, the most prestigious clerkships have been those with federal judges. At top national law schools, students compete very aggressively for federal clerkships and do so more so than they do for state judicial clerkships. Given the prestige of a federal clerkship, it can often make you marketable far beyond the geographic area where you are clerking.

2. State Court Clerkships

There are different distinctions in the state court system; however, in general, you also have a supreme court, appellate courts and trial courts. The same prestige distinctions are also present at the state level, with a state supreme court clerkship being the most prestigious. Just as certain federal district courts in various geographical locations are considered prestigious places to clerk in, so too are the state courts in different states. In general, if you are clerking for an appellate court in a major state, this will be more prestigious than if you are doing the same thing in a smaller state.

The problem with a state court clerkship is typically something that is also an advantage. While a state court clerkship will not necessarily increase your chances of being marketable anywhere throughout the United States, it can do you a tremendous amount of good in the area where you are clerking. Clerking for a state court will make you a candidate with important local contacts. The fact of the matter is that most litigation is actually conducted in the state courts. Accordingly, a state court clerkship will most likely provide you with a better understanding of state law than you would ever get as a federal clerk. If you are planning on working in the area where you are clerking, the state court clerkship should be enormously valuable.

You need to remember that accepting a clerkship is much like the decision of where you decided to go to law school. There are major national law schools that vary in prestige and there are smaller local law schools that vary in prestige. For example, attending a law school like Yale is going to give you a serious advantage when you are applying to positions throughout the United States. A law school like Yale might be compared to clerking on the Supreme Court. Conversely, a smaller more local law school like the University of Toledo is not going to give you as much an advantage throughout the United States. This school will, however, probably give you good options in Toledo, Ohio.

Accordingly, before you accept your clerkship, I would recommend having a good understanding of whether or not you want to work in the area where you will be clerking. The clerkship is most likely to make you marketable if you are seeking to work in the state where you are clerking. I would also do some research into where the judge’s former clerks ended up working. By learning this you can also get a decent idea of what your marketability might be following the clerkship.

Additionally, you have stated a concern about being “marketable”; nevertheless, you have not told me where you would like to be marketable. Do you want to be marketable in the area you are clerking in? Do you want to be marketable to a law firm, corporation, public interest group, prosecutor’s office? You get the idea. You should also think through the answers to these questions as you are deciding whether or not to clerk.

B. The Value of Your Clerkship Should Not Necessarily be Viewed as a Tool to Make You Marketable

Clerking is something that gives you tools and memories that most clerks carry with them throughout their careers. When you sit on the judge’s side of the bench, you get the feeling that you are really part of the legal process and have the idea of how decisions are made and the implications these decisions have on peoples’ lives. Most clerks describe the year they spent clerking as the most relaxing, intellectually challenging and interesting year of their lives. And this is really the essence of a clerkship. It allows you to see the inner workings of the legal system, work closely with a judge and will provide you with a level of illumination about the legal system itself that you will carry with you throughout your legal career.

My belief is that you should not clerk simply because you think it is something that will get you a better position. A clerkship is something that you should do because it will add depth and meaning to your future legal career. I do not believe that a state court clerkship (especially with an appellate judge) can possible hurt you in your marketability. Indeed, the skills and understanding you pick up during your clerkship will be something you can carry with you throughout your career.

C. Conclusions

In order to determine whether you should take a state court clerkship, it will be important that you analyze whether or not you want to work in the area of the country where you may be clerking. While a state court clerkship is typically not as prestigious as a federal one, it is something that can provide you with important local contacts and knowledge of state law. More importantly, I seriously doubt that a state court clerkship will hurt you. Instead, a state court clerkship will provide you with tools and an understanding of the legal system you can carry with you throughout your career.

While I have saved this for last, I believe that an important component of your question involves a brief discussion in this conclusion. You are a second year law student and it is only December. If your goal is to be marketable to a law firm, you may be “barking up the wrong tree” at this point by simply seeking a clerkship. Instead, you should accelerate your job search and apply to more law firms and look at more sources of information if working in a law firm is something you want to do. If you are considering accepting a clerkship just to make yourself more marketable, you are not doing yourself, the judge you will be working for, or the justice system itself any favors.

Share This Story:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • BlinkList
  • Blogosphere News
  • Blogsvine
  • description
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Faves
  • Furl
  • Live
  • NewsVine
  • Print this article!
  • Propeller
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • YahooMyWeb

{ 0 comments }

Getting an In-House Position

by A. Harrison Barnes on January 19, 2009

“Uncluttering the Maze Leading to an In-House Position”

There are several methods for finding an in-house legal position. The most common way that attorneys have traditionally gone in house is to accept a position with one of their clients. We would estimate that throughout history this is the most common way attorneys have gotten positions. Nevertheless, unless a client specifically asks you to come and work for them, the problems with getting a position this way can be quite pronounced. For example, if you ask your clients if you can come work for them, how does that make your current firm look? What’s more, what if word of your inquiry to the client leaks back to your law firm. You would be surprised how many attorneys this has happened.

Another strategy for getting an in-house position is by responding to ads on job posting boards. The problem with this way of looking for a position is that most in-house employers who post positions on job posting boards receive well in excess of 1,000 responses. In addition to often being confused about what to do with all the responses and frustrated with having to respond to them all, in-house employers are flooded with resumes of top attorneys seeking a better lifestyle, more predictable hours and no billable hours.

Probably the least common way for attorneys to get an in-house position is through a legal recruiting firm. The legal recruiting firm typically operates in the following manner in conducting an in-house search:

First, the recruiter cold calls numerous General Counsels or other corporate staff in an attempt to induce them to give them an opening. More often than not, the recruiter demands a meeting and goes to the meeting with a great deal of propoganda about the search firm. The General Counsel then will often speak with other search firms in an effort to negotiate fees and decide whom they believe will provide the best possible service. As you can imagine, it is a great deal of work for recruiters to get in-house positions; however, as discussed below, the benefits of the recruiter getting an in-house position can often pay dividends far greater than simply filling the in-house position.

Second, most of the time the recruiter will demand both an “exclusive” and a “retainer” to perform the in-house search.

By an exclusive, the recruiter will seek to prohibit the company from using any outside sources to fill the position for a minimum length of time (usually six months to a year). When a recruiter is granted an “exclusive” they also require the corporation to forward to them all resumes they receive for the attorney position for the length of the exclusive. Because recruiters want to use the name of the company in advertising the position, this prevents candidates from contacting the company directly (in which event the company would not have to pay the recruiter any fees).

In addition, the recruiter will typically demand that the company pay them a “retainer”. The “retainer” is typically set at a dollar amount which is between 1/3 and ½ of what the placement firm’s expected placement fee will be. Attorney placement firms typically charge corporations and other employers a fee to introduce you to the employer that is typically between 25 and 40% of your annual salary. The “retainer fee” is used by the placement firm to pay for advertising and other incidental expenses associated with finding candidates for the position.

When a placement firm places an ad for an in-house position they typically receive numerous, numerous, numerous inquiries. Out of what is often well in excess of 1,000 inquiries, the placement firm will very quickly whittle down the inquiries to less than 10 candidates and introduce these candidates to the corporation. A placement then, hopefully will be made.

From a recruiter’s standpoint, much of the beauty of doing in-house placements is that it very quickly provides the recruiting firm with hundreds and hundreds of candidates the recruiting firm knows are interested in alternative employment. Accordingly, while the recruiter will very rarely have suitable in-house positions for these attorneys, there are far more potential law firm opportunities than in-house opportunities and the recruiter will attempt to interest the candidates in them.

At Legal Authority we believe that the best method for finding an in-house position is by using our service. The beauty of using Legal Authority is that it counteracts most of the traditional obstacles to you getting an in-house position, which are (1) recruiters and (2) job boards. If you are playing games with these two methods for trying to get a position you may be waiting a very long time indeed.

Legal Authority assists attorneys in contacting every potential in-house employer in the area of the country they are interested in. The benefit of this is that your materials will arrive on the desk of every potential employer you could possibly ever want to work for. In addition, most in-house employers do not use recruiters to fill attorney positions. Using Legal Authority can help you contact the ones you are most interested in regardless of whether or not they use recruiters or typically advertise their openings on job posting boards.

In addition, Legal Authority can help you focus your search in the most appropriate way possible. For example, if you are seeking a position as a General Counsel, it would likely not be the most appropriate to contact the General Counsel about a potential position. Instead, you would be better served contacting a high level executive within a firm. This is something that Legal Authority can assist you in doing.

Legal Authority is the most effective way for getting an in-house position and when an attorney is switching positions it is often the only way that actually makes sense. Are in-house positions easy to get? We are the first to admit that an in-house position is not easy to get. However, using Legal Authority hundreds of attorneys have successfully gotten in-house positions and we believe that we get far, far more attorneys in-house positions each month than any recruiting firm in the United States.

Share This Story:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • BlinkList
  • Blogosphere News
  • Blogsvine
  • description
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Faves
  • Furl
  • Live
  • NewsVine
  • Print this article!
  • Propeller
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • YahooMyWeb

{ 0 comments }

How Do You Work With Employer Data at Legal Authority?

by A. Harrison Barnes on January 15, 2009

The process of working on client files at Legal Authority is quite complicated and works like this:

First, our clients generally sign up on our web site or call in. Once a client calls in or signs up on our web site, we call to schedule an appointment with them and they are assigned an Employment Advocate who will be their contact person throughout their search. With only one exception, all of our Employment Advocates are attorneys. Our Employment Advocates work with our clients through each step of the process.

Second, once an appointment is scheduled, a client speaks with one of our Employment Advocates about their job search and what they are seeking to do. During the phone call, a list of employers is generated which matches precisely what the client is seeking to do. The Employment Advocate will generally counsel the client about what they believe is the most appropriate steps for the candidate to follow in their job search. Employment Advocates are sort of like recruiters because their ultimate objective is to get you a job. The difference between an Employment Advocate and a traditional legal recruiter, however, is that Employment Advocates work with you.

In the third step of the process, the list of employers that the client and Employment Advocate agree upon is sent to our data review center and the resume is sent to our resume and cover letter department.

Our resume and cover letter department is also populated almost exclusively by attorneys. Two of our resume and cover letter personnel have worked in major New York law firms. Another holds a master’s degree in English Literature from the University of Pennsylvania. In our resume and cover letter department, with the input from what you are seeking to do gained from their discussions with you and your Employment Advocate a resume fitting exactly what you are seeking to do is crafted.

Our data center is extremely sophisticated, operates 24 hours a day seven days a week and is staffed by over twenty researchers. Our data center is populating our database with contact information every day of the week. Many of our candidates often ask us where we get our data and the answer is we get it from numerous sources. The least challenging aspect of our work is getting the data from printed sources. The problem with printed sources, however, is that a large percentage of law firms, corporations and other legal hiring organizations do not even list themselves in printed sources. A listing in Martindale Hubble, for example, costs firms several hundreds of dollars. At a cost exceeding $50,000 a month, our data center pulls information from other data sources making use of U.S. Government issued Standard Industry Classifications (SIC Codes) which classify businesses based upon the type of industry they are in. This information is constantly being double checked, reclassified and loaded into our database.

Once the candidate file is sent to the data center, the data center reviews the list of contacts put together by the Employment Advocate. Since each search is personal to everyone who uses our service, our list of contacts inside each legal hiring organization is never perfect. For example, we try to use contacts that are less than four months old. If a contact is less than four months old we do not use it and reinvestigate who the contact is. In addition, we very rarely have a full list of contacts within each hiring organization because each search our candidates performs is unique. Accordingly, the data center identifies which contacts on the Employment Advocates list either (1) need to be found, or (2) need to be updated and sends them to a researcher within the data center. This process of updating the information often takes less than a day. In some cases it has taken our data center over two weeks. Once the data center is happy with its information, it is sent to a data analyst.

Share This Story:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • BlinkList
  • Blogosphere News
  • Blogsvine
  • description
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Faves
  • Furl
  • Live
  • NewsVine
  • Print this article!
  • Propeller
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • YahooMyWeb

{ 0 comments }

Legal Authority Core Values

by A. Harrison Barnes on January 14, 2009

CORE VALUE 1: WE MUST GET ATTORNEYS JOBS
Core Observation: The reason our jobs exist is to get attorneys jobs.We are in the business of preserving and improving human life. All of our actions must be measured by the success in achieving this goal.

-Merck & Company, Internal Management Guide

I want to … express the principles upon which we in company have endeavored to live up to … Here is how it sums up: We try to remember that medicine is for the patient. We try never to forget that medicine is for the people. It is not for the profits. The profits follow, and if we have remembered that, they have never failed to appear. The better we have remembered it, the larger they have been.

-George Merck II

Imagine that all of us were suddenly transported to the year 2091. Much [of our strategy and methods] would have been changed by developments we cannot anticipate. But no matter what changed might have occurred in the Company, I know we would find one thing remained the same—and that thing matters most: the … spirit of Merck people … A century from now, I believe we would fee the same esprit de corps. … I believe this, above all, because Merck’s dedication to fighting disease, relieving suffering and helping people is a righteous cause—one that inspires people to dream of doing great things. It is a timeless cause, and it will lead Merck people to great achievements during the next hundred years.

-Roy Vagelos

Points to Ponder:
  • Success at Legal Authority depends on embracing the Core Value of getting attorneys jobs-Whether or not we realize it, the people who succeed and do not succeed here are people who embrace and understand this value. Present and future (long term) success has its symptoms:
    1. quality of advice,
    2. work ethic,
    3. ability to identify with others,
    4. how closely you are willing to look at the job market,
    5. how selfless you are,
    6. long term commitment,
    7. work product,
    8. contribution on multiple levels—aside from just being on phone,
    9. results.
  • Understanding the importance of work-Work is the most important component of life—it takes the most of our time and determines the quality of our existence. Helping others to work is among the most important tasks there is. We better the lives and futures of others.
  • Because the most important part of our jobs is to get attorneys jobs, every action we take should be calculated towards this-It is inappropriate to look at our jobs as serving only our self interest. As Employment Advocates, we should be adding a tremendous amount of value to the process of getting an attorney a job. The value we add:
    1. Having done research to assist attorneys find jobs,
    2. Having the persuasive power to get attorneys to apply for certain jobs,
    3. Having the ability to construct persuasive presentations to law firms,
    4. Understanding the nuances of the job search process and counseling candidates of the appropriate steps to take each step of the way,
    5. Closing deals on both sides and making action occur.
CORE VALUE 2: WE MUST DOMINATE THE MARKET
Core Value Observation: In order to dominate the market, we must be the best branded business in our field.To my imagination it is far more satisfactory to look at [well-adapted] specifies not as specially endowed or created instincts, but as small consequences of one general law leading to the advancement of all organic beings—namely, multiply, vary, let the strongest live and the weakest die.
-Charles Darwin, Origin of Species
Points to Ponder:
  • Market dominators are well branded-Consider the recent success of Yahoo!, Starbucks and Kinko’s. Each of these businesses pursued a relentless branding strategy.If you ask 100 people what their preferred choice of a search engine is, a large proportion of them are likely to say Yahoo! This result came in the market despite the fact that many other search engines such as AltaVista, Northern Light and others were consistently rated better.Yahoo!’s entire business strategy was based on branding. For years, Yahoo! lost millions of dollars, much of it simply getting its name out. It published Yahoo! Magazine and ensured that bookstores and newsstands displayed it—effectively creating billboards. The company ran millions of dollars of television commercials each year that delivered a simple, brand-driven message: “Do You Yahoo!”And we do.
  • Distinction between products and services-The typical product possesses one trait: it is tangible. As a result, we buy products because of their inherent qualities and their symbolic ones—the Coach briefcase, Hermes scarf, Volvo automobile. People buy these because of how they perform and also because of what they say about their owner.Products are made; services are delivered.Products are used; services are experienced.Services are invisible to everyone. We do not try and keep up with the Jones’ choice of an orthodontist, Internet service provider or therapist. (Indeed, our relationship with therapists, doctors, lawyers and others are protected from public scrutiny by rules of evidence and laws.)Services differ from products in one important way: control. You own the product you buy. You control it. Your services, however, are most apt to control you. The doctor or dentist determines what you need and when and how you will receive it. If you seek advice from a service, you find yourself at the provider’s mercy.We crave control, but feel a lack of it with services, so we feel less comfortable in or relationship with services. We need their reassurance that they will use their control intelligently, and in our best interest. With few exceptions—our choice of amusement parks, comedy clubs, and some restaurants, for example—we need to know the service is serious, experienced, consistent and reliable.
  • Why Legal Authority must be the best branded attorney outplacement business and dominate the market:
    1. People need to find us;
    2. Consumers will choose the most familiar business;
    3. People who work here will be proud of company;
    4. Company needs to survive;
    5. Will enable us to influence more people;
    6. Will make us an authority in our field;
    7. Will make people believe we are reliable;
    8. Will make people believe we are serious;
    9. Will make people believe we are experienced;
    10. Economic rewards.
  • Key Legal Authority brand component questions:
    1. Uniqueness-Is our brand unique?
    2. Vividness-Is our brand vivid?
    3. Simple-Is our brand simple?
    4. Does it communicate a clear and powerful message, in the way we most want and need to communicate?
    5. Is it inviting?
  • We must connect with people-consumers buy more than things; they purchase connections. (The remarkably named businesswoman Silver Rose described this perfectly. “I think adults invented work,” she observed, “so that they could play together all day.”)Our lives seem increasingly disconnected. Our drive for connection grows more intense. Making genuine, human connections becomes more important everywhere—not the least of all in our businesses every day.
    ·Advertising ·Content ·Being viewed as experts ·Being the only logical choice for attorneys ·Being in multiple places at once (law school, unqualified attorneys) ·Having access to the most attorneys ·Continually growing
CORE VALUE 3: WE CONSTANTLY CHANGE THE RULES OF THE GAME
Core Observation: Consumers tend to jump on the bandwagons leading up, and jump off those leading down. A band with positive direction attracts buyers; one with negative direction repels them.You can’t just keep doing what works one time, because everything around you is always changing. To succeed, you have to stay our in front of that change.
-Sam WaltonWe’re proud of our successes. And we celebrate them. But the real excitement comes in figuring out how we can do even better in the future. It’s a never ending process of seeing how far we can go. There’s no ultimate finish line when we can say “we’ve arrived.” I never want us to be satisfied with our success, for that’s when we’ll begin to decline.
-Hewlett-Packard Marketing ManagerSir Edmund Hillary was the first man to climb Mount Everest. On May 29, 1953 he scaled the highest mountain then known to man-29,000 feet straight up. He was knighted for his efforts. He even made American Express card commercials because of it! However, until we read his book, High Adventure, we don’t understand that Hillary had to grow into this success. You see, in 1952 he attempted to climb Mount Everest, but failed. A few weeks later a group in England asked him to address its members. Hillary walked on stage to a thunderous applause. The audience was recognizing an attempt at greatness, but Edmund Hillary saw himself as a failure. He moved away from the microphone and walked to the edge of the platform. He made a fist and pointed at a picture of the mountain. He said in a loud voice, “Mount Everest, you beat me the first time, but I’ll beat you the next time because you’ve grown all you are going to grow… but I’m still growing!Consider for a moment all the goods and services you buy from companies that are no more than a generation old—airline tickets from Southwest Airlines, furniture from IKEA, computers from Dell, collectibles from eBay, video games from Nintendo, books from Amazon and so forth. The world is hospitable from unorthodox newcomers.

An almost stupefying pace of change ensures that any business concept, no matter how brilliant, will over time, lose its economic efficiency. Starbucks rapidly became America’s premier coffee brand. The average Starbuck’s customer visits the store 18 times per month. Picture all the brand managers sitting in Switzerland, less than a decade ago, running Nescafe’, the world’ best selling coffee. Do you think they ever thought they could entice throngs of students and bus drivers to line up to pay three dollars for a cup of coffee. While they were worrying about things like market share, Proctor & Gamble and what color cans to put on supermarket shelves they were losing market share.

Industry leaders exploit the protective urge, any hesitancy on the part of the oligarcy.

Points to Ponder:
  • We must understand the weaknesses of our competition and exploit this-We are defined by what we are as much as we are defined by what we are not. The weaknesses of our competition are:
    1. Complacency;
    2. Lack of investment in infrastructure;
    3. Protectionist thinking;
    4. A lack of a core value that demands getting attorneys jobs;
    5. A desire for money over doing their work well;
    6. The inability to get enthusiastic about their candidates;
    7. The lack of a realization that the profession of recruiting is something that is just as important—if not a more important profession—than the practice of law;
    8. The inability to continue improving at all times;
    9. The inability or lack of desire to continually improve;
    10. getting people on board who are committed with doing the absolute most exceptional job possible in the recruiting arena;
    11. getting rid of people not committed to doing the best possible job in the recruiting arena;
    12. adequately branding their business;
    13. The inability to constantly question what a recruiting firm should be;
    14. The inability to do things as they should be done all the time.
We Should Be
Moving Away From Being
-Procedural
-Reductionist
-Extraopolative
-Elist
-Easy
And Being …-Creative
-Expansive
-Inventive
-Inclusive
-Demanding
CORE VALUE 4: WE MUST CONSTANTLY USE TECHNOLOGY TO DRIVE INNOVATION
Observation: If it were possible to establish conditions where persons could become united with a firm spirt of teamwork and exercise to their heart’s desire their technological capacity … then such an organization could bring untold pleasures and untold benefits … Those of like minds have naturally come together to embark on these ideals.
-Masaro Ibuka (founder of Sony in his business plan)Sony is a pioneer and never intends to follow others. Through progress, Sony wants to serve the whole world. It shall be always a seeker of the unknown … Sony has a principal of respecting and encouraging one’s ability … and always tries to bring out the best in a person. This is the vital force of Sony.
-Akia Morita (Chairman of Sony, 1976)
Points to Ponder:
  • We respect technology at Legal Authority and realize its value to who we are as a group-One of the first things that happened with the founding of this company was the investment in technology. This investment continues to this day.
  • The database is one of the most significant ways in which we communicate and assist with community building-Use the database to your advantage and realize its benefits.
  • Constant awareness in the need to invest in products and ideas will drive us forward.
CORE VALUE 5: WE MUST CONSTANTLY BE A TEAM
Observation: We are all a team with the objective of getting attorneys jobs. If you’re not willing to do your absolute best to get attorneys jobs—to write an exceptional cover letter, to go the extra mile at all times and work with other recruiters to make this happen—then you just don’t belong here, period. No one here is going to tell you to be a recruiting hero; it’s expected.IBM’s profile in the 1985 edition of The 100 Best Companies to Work For described IBM as a company that has institutionalized its beliefs the way a church does … The result is a company filled with ardent believes. (If you’re not ardent, you may not be comfortable.) … Some have compared joining IBM with joining a religious order or going into the military … If you understand the Marines, you understand IBM … you must be willing to give up some of your individual identity to survive.IBM begins imbuing its employees with its … philosophy even before they’re hired, at the very first interview. To some, the work “imbuing” connotes brainwashing, but I don’t think there’s anything negative … in what is done. Basically, anyone who wants to work for IBM is told: “Look this is how we do business … We have some very specific ideas about what that means—and if you work for us we’ll teach you how to treat customers. If our attitude about customers and service is incompatible with yours, we’ll part ways—the quicker the better.
-The IBM Way
Points to Ponder:
  • In order to succeed here in a meaningful way, you must have a fervent belief that you and your peers are here to get attorneys jobs-Our team is dedicated to getting attorneys jobs.
  • In order to succeed here in a meaningful way, you must have a fervent belief if doing your job as well as it can be done-Our team is dedicated to doing our jobs as well as possibly can be done.
Share This Story:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • BlinkList
  • Blogosphere News
  • Blogsvine
  • description
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Faves
  • Furl
  • Live
  • NewsVine
  • Print this article!
  • Propeller
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • YahooMyWeb

{ 0 comments }

Major Practice Areas Analyzed

by A. Harrison Barnes on January 14, 2009

Major Practice Areas Analyzed

Litigation

Litigation is as American as apple pie. In our litigious society, it is never likely to fall out of fashion.

Many attorneys decided to enter the law as young people because they were entranced by the glamorous trial lawyers they saw on film and television. While the real world is of course very different from the Hollywood version, there is no doubt that the kind of high-stakes, win-lose competitiveness intrinsic to litigation work exerts a powerful pull for many attorneys. Litigation is a game of chess that requires endless diligence, inspired creativity, brilliant arguments, and excellent negotiating skills.

The reality is that the vast majority of cases never go to trial, and that most are won or lost during the months or years of plodding preparation. This means that litigation associates spend most of their time assisting their superiors with the vast quantity of work that goes into the discovery process. This includes reviewing volumes of correspondence, drafting motions, taking depositions, and filing interrogatories.

Litigation is another relatively recession-proof practice area, because when individuals and companies are losing money, they are more likely to seek redress through the courts. The demand for litigators is thus countercyclical, and healthy in the current climate.
In addition to general commercial litigation, there are a number of different sub-practice areas, including contract disputes, employment, IP, securities, and toxic torts, to name a few. Some attorneys spend all or most of their time in one area or another, while others are generalists.

Litigators work at firms of all sizes, from major American general practice firms to small boutiques. The cultures at these firms are as heterogeneous as the firms themselves, but litigators are generally known for competitiveness, smarts and

What Do Recruiters Want?

From a recruiting standpoint, there are several things for litigators and aspiring litigators to bear in mind. While the market for litigators is strong and healthy, the number of litigators available to make a lateral move at any one time is also relatively high. This means that competition can be fierce for individual positions.

Some of the things that can set you apart from the pack include top-notch academic qualifications, Law Review, and participation in Moot Court. A federal clerkship is an outstanding asset, not only for the knowledge and contacts it can yield, but also for the distinction it confers. Successful litigators are smart, aggressive, and work very hard to win, and they expect that these same qualities will manifest themselves on an attorney’s resume.

If you have good experience in a relatively unusual area at a solid law firm, this can overcome other weaknesses in your credentials. Examples include toxic torts, employment, . IP and securities litigators are also in high demand, and these practice areas require special skills and experience..

Research and writing skills are critical in a litigator. Taking depositions and preparing interrogatories are
IP

If “plastics” was the one-word career advice given to Dustin Hoffman in The Graduate over three decades ago, “intellectual property law” would have been a likely 90’s legal version of the same. While the “dot gone” companies have vanished — taking along with them many of the attorneys (including IP) who provided them with legal services — there is no doubt that IP law is here to stay for the long haul.

As the United States and other industrialized economies have migrated from industrial production through a service economy to what has been termed “intellectual capitalism,” IP law has increased dramatically in importance. The engine of the U.S. economy has become ideas, and “knowledge workers” have been their driving force. In short, ideas are king. And attorneys who help inventors, entrepreneurs and artists to protect intellectual property play a vital role in their capitalization.

IP law can be divided, like Gaul, into three parts: patent prosecution, litigation, and “soft” IP (trademarks and copywrite). The technology recession and collapse of the “new economy” have affected each of these areas of law quite differently. The softness in the economy has prompted a softness in the job market for soft IP attorneys.

Law firms have responded to the contraction in business by engaging in a ‘flight to quality.’ Whereas previously patent prosecutors did not necessarily require an advanced degree in a technical field, that requirement is now frequently the norm. The reason for this is quite simple: understanding the technology behind patents is as vital as understanding patent law in getting patents issued. Nothing is more exasperating to a client than having an attorney that is unable to understand their invention.

That said, patent law is one of the few practice areas in which it is possible to work at a prestigious firm without having attended a stellar law school, or made law review. Even so, opportunities for patent prosecutors are thin on the ground and very competitive.

Bankruptcy

While debtor’s prisons (such as the one that held Charles Dicken’s father) were abolished along ago in North America, the inability to fulfill financial obligations continues to send record numbers of companies and individuals into insolvency. Bankruptcies are at an all-time high.

In a land of failing and failed businesses, the bankruptcy attorney is king. In this sense, bankruptcy law is not only recession proof, but also strongly countercyclical. Demand for bankruptcy associates and partners are naturally also at an all-time high.

Bankruptcy law comes from the US Bankruptcy Code, which itself stemmed from a provision in the US Constitution.

Within bankruptcy, there a number of sub-practice areas that it is possible to specialize in, including creditor’s rights,

What Do Recruiters Want?

Given the strong demand for bankruptcy associates at present, candidates with somewhat average credentials are currently able to land solid jobs. The top firms still require top law schools and good grades. But additional assets include a spell as an extern or clerk in a bankruptcy court, and working for a well-known bankruptcy practice, regardless of size.
People are at the heart of every enterprise. It should come as no surprise that labor and employment law are a vital

Corporate

Overview

Since the charter of the Jamestown Company was first drawn up in 1607, attorneys have been responsible for helping form, advising, and representing the companies that have played a significant role in shaping, and maintaining the wealth and prosperity of, the modern world. While many early “joint stock” companies merely required the imprimatur of a king or queen to authorize the scope of their operations, the vastly more complex regulatory, legislative, and legal requirements of the present day mean that virtually every commercial enterprise from the largest multinational to the humblest start-up needs a competent attorney to help them navigate the minefield of owning and/or operating a business.

Corporate attorneys are the trusted advisors who assist them in almost every sphere of their commercial activity, and in every stage of their life cycle. This entails addressing both tactical and strategic issues, from company formation to corporate governance, from startup and ongoing finance to possible liquidation or change in control (including private equity, M&A, and initial and subsequent public offerings), from employment agreements and “non-competes” to regulatory and tax compliance, among others.

The work of a corporate attorney is often more varied than in other areas of the law, and this can mean it is more interesting and rewarding. Furthermore, whether you are working at a law firm or at an in-house position, you are constantly interacting with other lawyers (both within other practice areas of your firm and opposing counsel), as well as non-lawyers at the companies you counsel. The best corporate attorneys have excellent communication skills, and are able to understand and anticipate client needs by wearing a business hat as well as a legal hat. Corporate attorneys help companies solve problems, from day-to-day issues to life-or-death transactions, and this can be as challenging as it is rewarding.

The Crisis in Corporate Practices

The current predicament of many corporate attorneys with dwindling billables, or worse, present or threatened unemployment, mirrors the macroeconomic trends of the last two years. While a “rising tide lifted all boats,” boosting associate and partner compensation to the stratosphere at many firms, the crash of the New Economy has brought pain and retrenchment with the massive falloff in business, like a neap tide suctioning jobs and money back from whence they came. Once eminent firms have shuttered, layoffs are legion, and virtually no corporate practice has been unscathed by the fallout. What is more, a classic supply and demand problem has made the market for corporate associates without portables a challenging one indeed: there are simply more corporate attorneys than there is demand for them. The law firm economics that once made hiring corporate associates so attractive — and profitable - before the crash in the summer of 2000, has reversed with the decline in billable hours. Once high-performing assets, recently minted corporate associates are now in many cases liabilities at firms that are struggling to break even, or better, turn a profit. The inflationary price wars that caused salaries to skyrocket have collapsed into stagnation and, in many cases, deflation.

From a recruiting standpoint, the situation is even direr for the corporate attorneys who chose to go “in-house” at the companies they were advising, and who are now seeking to rejoin law firms. Many of the companies they joined have either gone under or are going nowhere, and the options they were granted that once promised quick riches have transformed, Cindarella-like, back into worthless scraps of paper (and even worse, in many cases, tax liabilities where no monetary gain was ever realized). Rightly or wrongly, law firms take a dim view of this migration to in-house positions or solo practice, in part because they see it as a negative predictor of future “stickability.”

The same slogan “differentiate or die” that applies to businesses can also apply to corporate associates in a down economy. Without a unique or compelling competitive advantage, in the form of knowledge, skills, impeccable credentials or portable business, corporate associates are left to the vagaries of the job market. Being “jack of all trades” is not an attractive proposition when trade itself is down and you are competing with others with very specialized skill sets. There are, of course, many niches in which a corporate attorney can specialize, from securities and M&A to contracts to employment and litigation management.

The Road Ahead

The “supply overhang” that is responsible for so much suffering and economic loss is likely to persist beyond 2009. While it does, the opportunities for lateral moves are few and far between. Firms are now able to “cherry pick” young associates with outstanding credentials they once would have had no hope of courting. Even many capable young attorneys with stellar credentials are finding it difficult to get new jobs. Some, sadly, are abandoning the practice of law altogether, out of frustration or financial necessity.

But the prognosis is not dire over the medium to long term. While corporate associates are hostage to the same business cycle as the firms they advise, their fortunes will improve with economic expansion and the inevitable recovery that has followed every recession in American history. The day will not be long coming when the same cycle repeats itself, and many eager law school students are drawn by opportunity and financial gain into corporate practices across the land. Come hell or high water, corporate practices will continue to be the core revenue-driver at major American law firms.

As long as private enterprise continues to drive economic growth around the world, corporate attorneys will be needed to help them.

Early Years

Corporate associates cut their teeth drafting, revising, and in some cases negotiating boilerplate agreements. In addition to the tedium of practicing “form law,” and the bad habits this can encourage, the nature of this work means that writing, reading and revising stacks of generic documents are the initiation rites that young corporate associates must endure. To many, this work is neither intellectually arresting, nor particularly fulfilling, but the pleasure of working closely with clients makes it well worth the effort. The prospect of dealmaking later on, the job mobility in a good economy, and the financial rewards of working for a thriving practice are additional incentive to practice corporate law.

A Typical Day

Corporate attorneys spend most of their day on the telephone advising clients. Unlike litigators, who are shaped by the win-lose, binary nature of trials and settlements, successful corporate attorneys are masters of compromise and problem avoidance. Because large amounts of their business hours are spent on the phone, it is not unusual for corporate attorneys to work late hours, and pull all-nighters if crunch time has arrived in the form of a pending deal. With the recent decline in business, however, the more frequent reality today is of a collapse in billable hours. We have seen associates who billed in excess of 2300 hours at the height of the boom see their workloads fall to 1500 hours and under. This is a lose-lose, for the associate and their firm.

Flavors of Corporate Law

Corporate practice is not a monolith; there are, in fact, numerous niches within corporate practice that require different skills, backgrounds, and credentials. Likewise, these sub-practice areas are more or less attractive to law firms depending on the state of the economy and on the needs of their clients at any point in time. While defining these areas in great detail goes beyond the scope of this article, it is worth briefly mentioning a few: M&A, securities, and project finance.

Mergers and acquisitions are what happen when one company acquires, or is merged with, another. Because of the onerous reporting requirements and the many pitfalls that characterize such deals (including the potential of bankrupting the acquiring company in a bet-the-farm transaction), M&A activities require the assistance of M&A attorneys, as well as the investment bankers and executives on both sides of a deal. The devil is in the details, and the time to discover it is during due diligence. Due diligence is a laborious process that usually requires many weeks or months of frantic auditing activity, in which every single legal agreement and liability of the company being acquired must be gone over with a fine-toothed comb (often in conference rooms, and frequently late at night, the closer it gets to the deal date.) Since finance is the lifeblood of these deals, and in fact the key to a profitable return on both sides, an understanding of finance and accounting is the sine qua non of an M&A attorney. Many young M&A attorneys will have finance and accounting degrees, or even MBA’s. At the more senior levels, negotiating skills take over as a core skill.

The current state of the economy has caused some corporate associates with M&A backgrounds to increase their billable hours because of the number of failing businesses that must be sold, or that don’t have a realistic prospect of raising capital in the public markets in the near term. In these cases, corporate associates are engaged in extended negotiation and due diligence sessions that can still come to naught after months of work. Nevertheless, M&A is one area of specialization that is relatively desirable because it requires a special skill, and has favorable economics. As in other areas of the law, it helps to be mentored by a rainmaking partner - in this case, to teach the vital negotiation skills and black magic required to shepherd a desirable deal to fruition.

Corporate attorneys with a strong background in securities law are also in a more defensible position than those of the “garden variety.” These attorneys are expert at securities law, including the disclosure requirements of the 1934 Securities Act.
Access to the capital markets is the lifeblood of continued operations and shareholder value for all publicly held companies, as well as many privately held ones that hope — at some stage — to have an initial public offering. Many corporate associates who specialize in securities law will spend valuable time at the Securities and Exchange Commission. Unfortunately, the collapse in IPO activity in the last twenty-four months has caused a number of promising young securities attorneys to lose their jobs. Over the long term, this trend is likely to reverse. With high-profile scandals like Enron and Worldcom, and the new legislation that has been pushed through Congress, the onerous disclosure requirements companies whose sell securities face are sure to wax rather than wane, and so, therefore, will the workload of their corporate counsel.

Project finance associates are corporate attorneys who help facilitate major infrastructure deals, often in the international arena. Corporate attorneys who wish to work abroad at some stage of their career often seek opportunities in project finance, because many of these projects occur in Asia, and in developing countries, which are chronically short of infrastructure. Roads, bridges, dams, and power-generation plants are some of the types of projects that require project finance expertise. Because of the sheer scale of these multi-year projects, and the political uncertainties that sometimes accompany them, the risk and cost are spread among a number of financial institutions and investors. This means that project finance associates must be fluent in both finance and, in many cases, the local laws and regulations that constrain the methods by which such projects are effected.

In sum, while corporate attorneys can be generally characterized as attorneys who help companies to survive and thrive despite the many legal, regulatory, and business strategy challenges that they face - and many are, in fact, generalists firmly connected to their clients’ needs - there is in fact a wide variety of sub-practice areas. of specialties, that corporate attorneys can pursue.

IP

According to Peter Drucker, businesses (and for that matter, individuals who are engaged in commerce of some kind) are primarily concerned with marketing and innovation. IP attorneys help build, maintain and sustain a competitive advantage in the area of innovation, without which sustained economic development would be impossible. The reason that companies invest billions of dollars in research and development (R&D) each year is that they hope to capitalize on those inventions, be they in the area of biotechnology or pharmaceuticals, electrical engineering, or mechanical engineering. Without IP law, this would be impossible: inventions would simply be stolen in a free-for-all that would rapidly lessen the returns, and therefore the incentive, to innovate. The productivity gains that society relies on to become richer and more efficient with each passing year would likewise, in time, vanish. Before IP law, the world had a relatively stagnant economy for millenia. Then along came the US Constitution.

The three kinds of IP attorney are patent prosecutors, IP litigators, and trademark and copyrights attorneys. The areas of IP law include patents, copyrights, trademarks, unfair competition, and trade secrets.

Patents grant 20-year exclusive licenses (from the date of the patent application) to make, use, sell or license an innovation. In order to obtain a patent, the US Patent and Trademark Office needs to be convinced that the invention is new, useful, and not obvious in light of “prior art.” In one recent controversial case, this included the granting of a patent to Amazon for its “1-click” shopping (as a business process). A rash of recent litigation in this arena continues to prove the limits of patent law.

Patent prosecutors research, prepare, and apply for patents on behalf of their clients. In most cases, because of the technical nature of the work, it is necessary for the patent prosecutor to have one or more undergraduate or advanced degrees in engineering. Given the esoteric and often abstruse subject matter, patent prosecutors must be able to keep up with their clients, and stay one step ahead of the USPTO. Surprisingly, a strong technical degree will be a compensating factor in the job market for those who did not attend Top Twenty law schools. A strong scientific background opens doors at top firms that would otherwise be closed. The job market for patent prosecutors is currently fairly soft, although there is always room for the best. One of the additional requirements besides having an engineering degree is to have one or more patents issued, a process which usually takes several years.

Patent litigators help companies enforce, and thus secure the profitability of, their patents. As the number of patents increases tremendously by the year, the amount of litigation naturally rises as well. Some individual multinational companies will apply for many thousands of patents in a single year.

“Soft IP” lawyers are currently facing a recession. This phenomenon, like the glacial slowdown in general corporate work, will likely last throughout the present recession. The skills needed to be a soft IP lawyer are less rigorous. In effect, there are lower barriers to entry and many more young attorneys joined the party while the drinks were flowing. Now the hangover has set in.

Not all of the controversies regarding protecting intellectual property are as recent as they may appear; Hollywood itself was allegedly founded by men who crossed the country to avoid paying Thomas Edison the royalties due him for his invention, the movie projector.

Tax

Death and taxes being the only certainties in life, tax attorneys will be around until one or both are conquered, which might take a while.

Tax is an abstruse, technical subject that can reap significant rewards for individuals and corporations who

Share This Story:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • BlinkList
  • Blogosphere News
  • Blogsvine
  • description
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Faves
  • Furl
  • Live
  • NewsVine
  • Print this article!
  • Propeller
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • YahooMyWeb

{ 0 comments }